'Nonsensical'
tax cliff-edge leaves families paying hidden marginal tax rates in system that
has 'no plausible rationale', Institute for Fiscal Studies says
Many middle-class professionals are paying an income tax rate of 60 per cent
as a result of a little-understood policy introduced by the last Labour
government which affects more than 500,000 people, a leading economist has
warned.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that it is "hard to make
much sense" of a loophole in income tax rules which means that those
earning between £100,000 and £120,000 now pay 60p of every pound they earn in
tax.
The hidden tax rate is a third higher than the 45p top rate of tax which is
widely believed to be the maximum raid on income.
Paul Johnson, the director of the IFS, said that there was "no
plausible rationale" for the income tax system and accused Governments led
by both main parties of introducing "poor tax policies".
"There is a basic rate of income tax of 20 per cent, a higher rate of
40 per cent and a top rate now of 45 per cent," he said. "What is
less well known is that the last government introduced a rate of 60 per cent on
a band of income starting at £100,000. This government has maintained it and
effectively increased its range considerably. There is now a 60 per cent rate
of income tax on income between £100,000 and £121,000 (where it drops back to
40 per cent). It’s hard to make much sense of that."
He added that the failure of successive Governments to increase the income
levels at which the higher rates of tax become payable had dramatically widened
their reach – "fundamentally altering the nature" of the income tax
system.
"The point at which the 45p rate becomes payable, and indeed the point
at which the 60p rate becomes payable, is fixed in cash terms and has already
fallen by more than 12 per cent relative to the Consumer Prices Index
[inflation] since its introduction," he said. "More people will
gradually be pulled into these higher rates. There is apparently no plan to
stop this."
The IFS analysis identified 11 major other areas of the tax system as being
unfair – eight introduced by Labour which have not been reversed by the
Coalition, and three new sets of policies introduced by George Osborne.
In an attack on the UK tax system Mr Johnson also said:
-- Stamp duty taxes are "one of the worst designed and most damaging of
all taxes" which will soon raise £15 billion annually. In the most extreme
cases, a £1 increase in sale price can trigger an additional £40,000 tax bill.
"The tax helps to gum up the entire property market".
-- Changes to the pension regime introduced by Labour introduced an
"absurd complication". The system has been blighted by "short
term meddling and complication" and policies pledged by Ed Miliband
threaten to "further complicate" the situation.
-- The imminent introduction of a married couples’ tax allowance, which will
be gradually withdrawn for higher-rate taxpayers, is also beset by problems.
"Since the full value of the allowance is withdrawn as soon as one partner
becomes a higher rate tax payer, it is possible to become more than £200 a year
worse off as a result of a £1 pay rise."
-- Council tax bills are now assessed on property values which will soon be
25 years out of date. "This situation is becoming increasingly
absurd".
-- Governments "of all stripes" have "continually" cut
income tax while increasing National Insurance. This is described as being
"politically easier".
The intervention by the IFS will add to the growing pressure on George
Osborne to radically reform the tax system if the Conservatives are re-elected
to help the middle classes.
Both Mr Osborne and David Cameron have repeatedly stressed that their
priority is to help the lower paid. However, a growing number of Conservative
MPs believe that help must now also be forthcoming to help higher-rate
taxpayers.
Mr Johnson said that politicians are "culpable" for "poor tax
policies" that mean many middle-class households lose more than half of
the value of any pay rise to the Exchequer.
Those affected by "cliff-edge" tax rates include married couples,
middle-class families and successful professionals.
The 60p rate occurs because those earning between £100,000 and £121,000 lose
their tax-free personal allowance which means they pay higher rates of tax on
this portion of their income.
In a speech to financial experts in London, Mr Johnson criticised both
current and past minsters for repeatedly making complicated and
poorly-explained changes to the tax system, creating anomalies and
inconsistencies that affect millions of people.
He said: "Complexity, uncertainty and inefficiency in a tax system
which takes £4 in every £10 generated in the economy costs a huge amount in
lower welfare, less economic output and straightforward inequity.
"Even if we can’t have perfection, something close to coherence and
consistency would be nice."
The IFS expects there to be 5.3 million higher and additional-rate taxpayers
in 2015-16, up from 3.3 million in 2010-11.
That shift lacks democratic legitimacy, Mr Johnson suggested.
"The problem is not necessarily so much the fact of the change – there
is a case for, and a case against, such a system – but the fact that this
fundamental change to our tax system, which appears to have the support of the
three main political parties, has never been announced or properly debated.
source : telegraph.co.uk
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar